Connect with us

Judiciary & Court

Lagos court voids restriction of Estate residents’ movement

Published

on

Adeleke Adebesin Platform Capital, Coca-Cola Medicine Bricklayer Adeigbagbo Harrison Murder IGP Drug Dealer Drugs Trafficking Cultism united capital trustees court logo lockdown oil and gas Unitech Drilling Company poison atiku marriage divorce healthplus port harcourt fraud Nadabo Kelechi Mbagwu kabul MRA VAT Madu Ozoemena fraud Olarenwaju Suraju land fraud addax cocaine murder fidelity bank noodles custody sexual starvation rape stealing employment scam Stab dupe Ghanaian Fishermen Pardon land grabbing false statements surety Life imprisonment human trafficking Baba Chado Kantigi Okafor Emmanuel Indian Civil Servants Public Servants Money Laundering Ikorodu cocaine pregnant woman Beating Idumota Tricyclist Moses Erih Childcare Omafume Augustina Ayinuola

A Lagos State High Court, sitting in Ikeja, has nullified a movement restriction order placed on homeowners in Pearl Garden Estate at Sangotedo in Eti-Osan Local Government Area of the state by CMB Building Maintenance and Investment Company Limited.

The trial judge, Mufutau Olokoba, declared the restriction illegal while delivering verdict in the suit filed by some of the homeowners against CMB (property and the estate management agents) and the Oyetubo Jokotade Estate Resource Limited (previous landowners).

The claimants, Messrs Francis Adesuyi, Felix Obiakor, Martin Ajayi-Obe and Peter Afenotan filed the N100 million suit in February 9, 2015 on behalf of themselves and other estate residents against the property developers.

While delivering the judgement, Justice Olokoba observed that the property developers trampled on the claimants’ rights by restricting their movement in and out of the estate.

Advertisement

He also declared as null and void an estate charge of N35,000 imposed by the second defendant on the claimants.

The judge, however, refused to cede the claimants’ requests, which demanded the defendants to pay them the sum of N100 million in damages. Instead, he ordered the defendants to bear the cost of the action.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2015 - 2024 ChronicleNG

Discover more from Chronicle.ng

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading