Connect with us

Judiciary & Court

Shareholder battles Seven Energy, 13 others over restructuring

Published

on

Adeleke Adebesin Platform Capital, Coca-Cola Medicine Bricklayer Adeigbagbo Harrison Murder IGP Drug Dealer Drugs Trafficking Cultism united capital trustees court logo lockdown oil and gas Unitech Drilling Company poison atiku marriage divorce healthplus port harcourt fraud Nadabo Kelechi Mbagwu kabul MRA VAT Madu Ozoemena fraud Olarenwaju Suraju land fraud addax cocaine murder fidelity bank noodles custody sexual starvation rape stealing employment scam Stab dupe Ghanaian Fishermen Pardon land grabbing false statements surety Life imprisonment human trafficking Baba Chado Kantigi Okafor Emmanuel Indian Civil Servants Public Servants Money Laundering Ikorodu cocaine pregnant woman Beating Idumota Tricyclist Moses Erih Childcare Omafume Augustina Ayinuola

A Federal High Court in Lagos, Southwest Nigeria has ordered that all the court process filed before the court by a minority shareholder of Seven Energy International Limited Company be served on the  company and 13 other defendants, majority of whom are outside the jurisdiction of the court.

The order of the court which was issued by the presiding judge, Chuka Obiozor on the 8th December, 2020 is to be served through any reputable courier service.

The minority shareholder, Saltire Investment Company filed the petition against Seven Energy International Limited  and 13 others namely, Seven Exploration & Production Limited, Accugas Limited, Savannah Energy, African Infrastructure Investment Managers, Seven Uquo Gas Limited, Mr Micheal Lynch-Bell, Ani Umoren, Bassey Umoh, Chris Thomas, Ian Brown Peterside, Manish Maheshwari, Daniel Svanstrom and Mr Atul Gupta over oppressive, unfair and prejudicial way of running the company.

The minority shareholder Saltire Investment Limited, is claiming special damages in the sum of $14,740,123.94.

Advertisement

In a petition filed before the court on behalf of Saltire Investments Limited by the law firm of SimmonsCooper Partners, the petitioner who is a minority shareholder holding about 2% of the Seven Energy International Limited, alleged thus, that it is challenging the unfairly prejudicial actions of the respondents which actions are contrary to the shareholding interest of the petitioner and other shareholders of the Seven Energy International Limited.

Despite express disapproval of the the transaction by the petitioner and other shareholders of the company at shareholders meeting the 7-14 respondents Mr Micheal Lynch-Bell, Ani Umoren, Bassey Umoh, Chris Thomas, Ian Brown Peterside, Manish Maheshwari, Daniel Svanstrom who are the Directors and controlling minds of Seven Energy International Limited who were alleged to have sold the assets of Seven Energy International Limited, Seven Exploration & Production Limited, Accugas Limited and Seven Uquo Gas Limited to Savannah Energy and Africa Infrastructure Investment managers and the 14 respondent  Mr Atul Gupta, who is the former chairman and director of Seven Energy International Limited were alleged to have proceeded to wrongfully procure illegal and unauthorized board resolution, as they wrongfully concluded purported negotiation on transaction which centers around the transfer of all the primary assets and cash generating businesses of the company to Savanna Energy and African Infrastructure Investment managers without authorization, with even clear order of the court to cease further steps pending the determination of the suit.

Sometime in 2016, under the pretext that it was facing operational funding and liquidity challenges, the company through its controlling mind 7-14 respondents, commenced unathorised negotiation with relevant stakeholders and investor on possible restructuring options available.

However, the company’s balance sheet as at September 2019 revealed that rather than protect the interest of the shareholders especially the already unfairly treated and the prejudiced minority shareholders such as the petitoner, the administration of the company has been steered  towards a huge loss with the company incurring a huge deficit to the tune of,$2,092,399,624 representing a significant increase in the total liability of the company and thereby imperiling the petitioner’s shareholding value as a minority shareholder in the company.

Advertisement

Savanna Energy’s balance sheet also revealed that the company is not a capable counter-party to buy or restructure Seven Energy International Limited.

When the unauthorized restructuring discussion commenced with Savannah Energy Company in 2017, it had less than 10 employees, with no revenue, production or reserves and only $8,400,000 in cash with outstanding exploration commitment on its assets exploration permits in Niger.

On the contrary Seven Energy International Limited owns $2,400,000,000 in assets, two trillion cubic feet of gross gas, 80,000 barrell of oil equivalent per day production and supplies to over 20 million Nigerians with reliable gas. Despite this glaring and abject lack of capacity of the Savannah Energy to buy or restructure Seven Energy International Limited the 7th-14th respondents wilfully proceeded with the unauthorized transaction and thereby imperilled and greatly prejudiced the petitioner’s minority shareholding interest in an unfair manner.

Consequently, the petitioner brings this petition on the basis of the prejudicial, oppressive, unfair, unlawful, and unauthorized manner the transaction was carried out with the attendant losses to the company prime assets, cash generating businesses, and subsidiaries which has adversely eroded the minority shareholders rights and interests of the petitioner in the company.

Advertisement

Consequently, the petitioner is urging the court to declare that by the facts contained in the petition and the relevant sections of Company and Allied Matters Act, the 7th to 14th respondents acted oppressively, unfairly, prejudicially and without authorization when the said respondents unilaterally and arbitrarily, decided to negotiate and conclude the negotiation for the unauthorized restructuring of the company.

The petitioner is also seeking the following orders of the court, to set aside all contract, agreement and extinguishing all rights and obligations arising from the oppressive and unlawful  restructuring of the companies.

An order of perpetual injunction restraining all the respondents, their agents and any person acting under authority of the respondents from taken further steps or action in furtherance of the unlawful restructuring of the companies.

An order of this honourable court granting special damages against the Seven Energy International Limited Company and the 7th-14 respondents in the sum of $14,740,123.94, to the petitioner for the fundamental and substantial erosion of the equity and value of the petitioner’s shares.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the presiding judge, Chuka Obiozor has adjourned till 27 of January,2021 for hearing.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2015 - 2024 ChronicleNG

Discover more from Chronicle.ng

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading