Connect with us

Judiciary & Court

EFCC to appeal ruling on freezing of Benue govt account

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, says it will appeal a federal high court verdict in favour of Benue State Government.

Published

on

'I am capable of defending my actions as Benue Governor', Ortom insists
Governor Samuel Ortom of Benue State challenged EFCC's decision to freeze the state account
Governor Samuel Ortom of Benue State challenged EFCC’s decision to freeze the state account

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, says it will appeal a federal high court verdict in favour of Benue State Government.

The anti-graft agency said that it has reviewed the judgment delivered by Justice Mobolaji Olajuwon of the Federal High Court sitting in Makurdi, Benue State.

“Having reviewed yesterday’s judgment which awarded N50 million damages against the Commission and N25 million each against UBA and Fidelity Bank in favour of the state government, we wish to state that we will appeal the ruling,” EFCC acting spokesperson, Tony Orilade said in a statement.

He added that, “It is important that we put to test the verdict of this court of first instance in a superior court on the grounds that if a verdict such as this is allowed to stand, it may undermine the patriotic efforts of the Commission in tackling corruption.

READ: FG employs 4,500 workers for housing scheme in Osun

Advertisement

“We also note that it is capable of sending the wrong signal against the judicial system, when a matter as serious as what led the EFCC to probe the account of the state government could be decided on technicalities rather than the merit of the action of the Commission.

“It will be recalled that consequent upon our investigations into the financial dealings of the state governor in August last year, we directed for a temporary freeze of the government’s account with UBA and Fidelity Bank, a practice that is instructive in the course of investigations in such circumstances as a result of the limitation on interferences it makes on such accounts.”

“We wish to state with high sense of responsibility that we have, as a Commission, taken such actions as a necessity, since it is within our mandate, derived from the law.

“We also wish to state that our lawyers are making necessary arrangements to challenge the verdict, as we believe that the judgment is a miscarriage of justice that cannot stand the test of time,” the anti-graft agency said.

Advertisement
Advertisement
1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2015 - 2024 ChronicleNG

Discover more from Chronicle.ng

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading